Cultural Sustainability of Profit Sharing Among Minangkabau Migrant Entrepreneurs: A Study of the Mato System in Padang Restaurants

Authors

  • Mulyani Rizki Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Ris'an Rusli Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70095/alamwal.v18i1.24828

Keywords:

Mato System, Cultural Sustainability, Profit-Sharing, Minangkabau Migrants

Abstract

Introduction: Culturally embedded economic systems face significant challenges amid modernization, urbanization, changing employment relations, and increasing demands for business efficiency. Nevertheless, some local economic practices have demonstrated remarkable resilience because they function not merely as economic mechanisms but also as integral components of their communities’ social and cultural identities. This study aims to analyze the cultural sustainability of the Mato System as a profit-sharing mechanism practiced in Padang restaurants owned by Minangkabau migrants in Palembang, Indonesia.

Methods: The study employs a qualitative approach with an ethnographic design. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews with the owner and employees of Palapa Restaurant, and documentation of business practices. The data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model with the support of NVivo 12, while the credibility of the findings was strengthened through source and methodological triangulation.

Results: The findings reveal that the sustainability of the Mato System is shaped by three interrelated mechanisms. First, cultural continuity is maintained through the preservation and transmission of the values of justice, togetherness, trustworthiness, responsibility, and the Minangkabau philosophy of Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah (custom is founded upon Islamic law, and Islamic law is founded upon the Qur’an). Second, social cohesion is fostered through trust, deliberation, solidarity, and relational accountability between the business owner and employees. Third, economic adaptability is reflected in the system’s capacity to make technical adjustments in response to changes in the business environment without compromising its core values. The findings further demonstrate that muraqabah reinforces these three mechanisms through the spiritual awareness that all business activities are conducted under the constant supervision of Allah.

Conclusion and suggestion: This study proposes the concept of adaptive cultural sustainability, whereby the continuity of local economic practices is achieved not through the static preservation of tradition, but through the maintenance of core cultural values alongside the adaptation of operational practices to changing circumstances. The Mato System therefore demonstrates that local wisdom can function simultaneously as an economic resource, a mechanism of social governance, and a foundation for long-term business sustainability Future research could test the applicability of the adaptive cultural sustainability model in other Padang restaurants across different migrant destinations or compare it with culturally based profit-sharing systems in other Indonesian communities.

References

Adnan, M. A. (2023). The power of sharing the case of Sederhana (SA) restaurants in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 11–20.

Allsop, D. B., Chelladurai, J. M., Kimball, E. R., Marks, L. D., & Hendricks, J. J. (2022). Qualitative methods with Nvivo software: A practical guide for analyzing qualitative data. Psych, 4(2), 142–159.

Atiqah, F., & Puspawati, D. (2022). Analisis penerapan sistem “MATO” pada manajemen penggajian karyawan di restoran padang sederhana di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 10(2). file:///C:/Users/WIM 10/Downloads/645-Article Text-2854-1-10-20220531.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Crowley, F., & Barlow, P. (2022). Entrepreneurship and social capital: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 492–519.

Dalkin, S., Forster, N., Hodgson, P., Lhussier, M., & Carr, S. M. (2021). Using computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS; NVivo) to assist in the complex process of realist theory generation, refinement and testing. International journal of social research methodology, 24(1), 123–134.

Dhakal, K. (2022). NVivo. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(2), 270.

Dharmasiri, I. P., Galappaththi, E. K., Baird, T. D., Bukvic, A., & Rijal, S. (2025). From roots to resilience: Exploring the drivers of indigenous entrepreneurship for climate adaptation. Sustainability, 17(10), 4472.

Forrest, J. (2022). Doing field projects: Methods and practice for social and anthropological research. John Wiley & Sons.

Gill, S. L. (2020). Qualitative sampling methods. Journal of human lactation, 36(4), 579–581.

Girling, R. (2024). Global embeddedness: situating migrant entrepreneurship within an asymmetrical, global context. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 13(1), 109–127.

Granovetter, M. (1997). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. International library of critical writings in economics, 83, 142–171.

Hanif, H., & Rahman, A. (2022). Mendorong Pertumbuhan UMKM dengan Menggunakan Konsep Bagi Hasil Sistem Mato. Journal of Management and Bussines (JOMB), 4(2), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.31539/jomb.v4i2.4448

Harahap, N., & Harahap, A. H. J. (2024). Connecting Connecting Local Wisdom and Social Media: Innovative Strategies in Building Economic Sustainability and Overcoming Unemployment. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 13(3), 455–463.

Hati, S. R. H., Putri, N. I. S., Daryanti, S., Wibowo, S. S., & ... (2022). Brand familiarity vs profit-sharing rate: which has a stronger impact on Muslim customers’ intention to invest in an Islamic bank? Journal of Islamic …. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2020-0247

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social science & medicine, 292, 114523.

Irjayanti, M., & Lord, L. (2024). Operating a business with local wisdom: a grounded research of women in the creative industry. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2392047.

Kloosterman, R., Van Der Leun, J., & Rath, J. (1999). Mixed embeddedness:(in) formal economic activities and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International journal of urban and regional research, 23(2), 252–266.

Lassalle, P., Johanson, M., Nicholson, J. D., & Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2020). Migrant entrepreneurship and markets: The dynamic role of embeddedness in networks in the creation of opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 523–536.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 10). Cambridge university press Cambridge.

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1753–1760.

Mika, J. P., Fahey, N., & Bensemann, J. (2019). What counts as an indigenous enterprise? Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 13(3), 372–390.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3/E.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.

Padilla-Meléndez, A., Plaza-Angulo, J. J., Del-Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Ciruela-Lorenzo, A. M. (2022). Indigenous entrepreneurship. Current issues and future lines. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34(1–2), 6–31.

Polychronopoulos, D., & Nguyen-Duc, A. (2024). Migrant entrepreneurship support in Europe: a PRISMA systematic literature review. F1000Research, 12, 1300.

Porfírio, J. A., Felício, J. A., Rodrigues, R. M., & Carrilho, T. (2024). Exploring migrant entrepreneurship and innovation in ultraperipheral regions: an investigation on opportunity and necessity-driven entrepreneurship. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100573.

Portes, A., Haller, W. J., & Guarnizo, L. E. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American sociological review, 67(2), 278–298.

Qurota’ayun, M. I., & Anggadwita, G. (2026). Optimizing local wisdom in coffee entrepreneurship to strengthen cultural identity in Pangalengan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 29(1), 43–60.

Rizki, M., Rusli, R., & Barkah, Q. (2025). Murāqabah in practice: An ethnographic analysis of the Minangkabau Islamic Mato profit-sharing system in an urban Padang restaurant. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 103–128.

Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., Meo-Sewabu, L., & Decena, T. (2017). Indigenous entrepreneurship on customary land in the Pacific: Measuring sustainability. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(6), 774–785.

Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International journal of social research methodology, 21(5), 619–634.

Sinkovics, N., & Reuber, A. R. (2021). Beyond disciplinary silos: A systematic analysis of the migrant entrepreneurship literature. Journal of World Business, 56(4), 101223.

Solano, G., Schutjens, V., & Rath, J. (2022). Multifocality and opportunity structure: towards a mixed embeddedness model for transnational migrant entrepreneurship. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), 3.

Swanson, K. K., & DeVereaux, C. (2017). A theoretical framework for sustaining culture: Culturally sustainable entrepreneurship. Annals of Tourism Research, 62, 78–88.

Syrett, S., & Keles, J. Y. (2022). A contextual understanding of diaspora entrepreneurship: identity, opportunity and resources in the Sri Lankan Tamil and Kurdish diasporas. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 376–404.

Wang, Q., & Richardson, L. (2021). Race/ethnicity, place, and art and culture entrepreneurship in underserved communities. Cities, 115, 103243.

Weng, H., & Wang, C. C. (2024). Social capital and internal migrant entrepreneurship: Evidence from urban China. Cities, 152, 105222.

Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: an integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241296206.

Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2022). Extending mixed embeddedness to a multi-dimensional concept of transnational entrepreneurship. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), 14.

Zainal, S., Nirzalin, Fakhrurrazi, Yunanda, R., Ilham, I., & Badaruddin. (2024). Actualizing local knowledge for sustainable ecotourism development in a protected forest area: insights from the Gayonese in Aceh Tengah, Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2302212.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Cultural Sustainability of Profit Sharing Among Minangkabau Migrant Entrepreneurs: A Study of the Mato System in Padang Restaurants. (2026). Al-Amwal : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 18(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.70095/alamwal.v18i1.24828

Similar Articles

41-50 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.