Developing Two-Tier Essay for Diagnostic Test Instrument to Identify Student Learning Difficulty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i2.2683Keywords:
Diagnostic test, two-tier test, student’s learning difficulties, energy and workAbstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a two-tier essay diagnostic test instrument (DTTE) to identify students' learning difficulties. The research adopted by Borg and Gall stages with data collection techniques used are interviews and tests. In the development, there were five valid items DTTE with material feasibility (100%), construction (95,5%), and language (100%). The development results showed the instrument reliability criteria using Cronbach's Alpha (0.76) for the limited trial and field test (0.81). Based on these results DTTE instruments meet the criteria of good, valid and reliable. Analysis of students' learning difficulties based on learning purpose, they are understanding the kinetic and potential energy, able to explain the influence of angle on work, able to explain the work sense in the graph, and understanding the effort by various styles, to understand relationship work with kinetic energy, with potential energy, and understand conservation of mechanical energy is 92.6%, 90.5%, 89.4%, 89.4%, and 91.5%.References
Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effects of two-tier multiple choice diagnostic assessment items on students’ learning outcome in basic science technology (BST). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 201-210. DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p201
Akbar, S., & Sriwiyana, H. (2010). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS). Yogyakarta: Cipta Media.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bayrak, B. K. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primary students' conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid-base. MIJE, 3(2), 19-26. DOI: 10.13054/mije.13.21.3.2
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307. DOI: 10.1039/B7RP90006F
Fitri, R., & Asyikin, N. A. (2015). Aplikasi penilaian ujian essay otomatis menggunakan metode cosine similarity. Jurnal Poros Teknik, 7(2), 88-94. DOI: 10.31961/porosteknik.v7i2.218
Fortuna, D., Chandra, E., & Gloria, R. Y. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik untuk mengukur miskonsepsi siswa pada pokok bahasan sistem regulasi manusia untuk siswa SMA kelas XI semester II. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(2). Available online: http://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/sceducatia/article/view/514
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.
Gurel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students' misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. DOI: 10.12973.eurasia.2015.1369a
Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersen, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
Kanli, U. (2015). Using a two-tier test to analyses students' and teachers' alternative concepts in astronomy. Science Education International, 26(2), 148-165. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064041.pdf
Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2004). Ability and critical thinking as predictors of change in students' psychological misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4). Available online: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-126582634/ability-and-critical-thinking-as-predictors-of-change
Kurniasih, N., & Nukhbatul, B. H. (2017). Penggunaan tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice untuk menganalisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi archaebacteria dan eubacteria. Jurnal Tadris Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 114-127. Available online: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/indek.php/biosfer/index
Kurniawan, D., & Maryanti, S. (2018). Analysis of math teacher candidates’ misconception on the dynamic electricity concept. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 67-78. DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i1.2481
Lucariello, J., Tine, M. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2014). A formative assessment of students’ algebraic variable misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 30-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.001
Mustain, I. (2015). Kemampuan membaca dan interpretasi grafik dan data: studii kasus pada siswa kelas 8 SMPN. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(2). Available online: http://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/sceducatia/article/view/493
Nofiana, M., Sajidan, & Puguh. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi two-tier multiple choice questionuntuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada materi kingdom plantae. Jurnal Inkuiri, 3(2), 60-67. Available online: http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sains
Perwitasari, A. D. (2015). Pengembangan tes diagnostik berbasis web pada materi termodinamika untuk mengidentifikasi tingkat pemahaman konsep siswa. Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang. Available online: http://lib.unnes.ac.id/21894/
Pratiwi, D., & Lepiyanto, A. (2017). Profil miskonsepsi calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah PPL II. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 8(1), 33-44. DOI: 10.24127/bioedukasi.v8i1.834
Rositasari, D., Nanda, S. D., & Salamah A. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier untuk mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada topik asam-basa. Edusains, 6(2), 170-176. Available online: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/1148
Siswaningsih, W. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi kimia siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 19(1), 117-127. Available online: http://journal.fpmipa.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/article/download/487/pdf_21
Siswanto. (2006). Penggunaan tes essay dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Akuntansi Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 55-61. Available online: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpakun/article/view/864
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsimi, A. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Rupa Aksara.
Syafiie, I., K. (2015). Pengantar ilmu pemerintahan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Widiarso, W. (2007). Mengestimasi reliabilitas. Diperoleh 3 Juni 2013, Available online: http://widhiarso.staff.ugm.ac.id/files/bab_2_estimasi_ reliabilitas_via_spss.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LETTER OF COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT
I am the author of an article on Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains in collaboration with the Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII), the undersigned:
State that:
- My paper is the work itself, authentic, has never been published in journals and other publications;
- My paper is a work on original ideas / research, not the result of plagiarism;
- My paper was not published from the help of others, except on the recommendation of the editorial and reviewer board that was selected by this journal;
- My paper, there are no writings or opinions that I have written other than including the reference source in the bibliography;
- I give all my copyright of this paper to this journal include the right for managing and publication;
- I make this assignment surely. If there are distortion and untruth in this assignment, later, I will take responsibility as the current law.
