Refleksi Humanisme dalam Perspektif Erich Fromm berbasis Penelitian Pengembangan Modul Ajar Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter Berbantuan Artificial Intelligence

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 13-07-2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/mbybe260
Keywords:
Pendidikan Nilai, Pendidikan Karakter, Artificial Intelligence, Humanisme Erich Fromm.

Main Article Content

Indra Gunawan
UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Fuad Nawawi
UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Fauzan Akbar Novianto
UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam pendidikan menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan bagi pendidikan nilai dan karakter. Artikel ini bertujuan merefleksikan penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan nilai dari perspektif humanisme Erich Fromm dengan berpijak pada hasil penelitian pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbasis AI pada mata kuliah Teori Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pijakan penelitian dan pengembangan terdahulu yang menerapkan metode Research and Development (R&D) melalui model Educational Design Research (EDR). Data empiris dianalisis melalui refleksi filosofis dengan menggunakan konsep being, having, dan automaton conformity dari Erich Fromm. Hasil refleksi menunjukkan bahwa AI tidak bersifat dehumanisasi apabila digunakan sebagai medium reflektif dan dialogis, bukan sebagai pengganti peran pendidik. Sebaliknya, AI dapat memperkuat proses pemaknaan nilai, kesadaran diri, dan tanggung jawab moral peserta didik ketika diintegrasikan dalam kerangka pedagogi humanistik. Artikel ini juga menegaskan bahwa peran pendidik tetap sentral sebagai subjek pedagogis dan penjaga orientasi nilai, sementara AI berfungsi sebagai mitra pedagogis yang mendukung pembelajaran reflektif. Secara teoretis, artikel ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian filsafat pendidikan dengan menawarkan kerangka humanisme reflektif sebagai dasar etis penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan nilai dan karakter di era digital.


ABSTRACT: The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education presents both opportunities and challenges for value and character education. This article aims to reflect on the use of AI in value education from the perspective of Erich Fromm’s humanism, grounded in the results of developmental research on an AI-based learning module implemented in the Theory of Value and Character Education course. The study adopts a qualitative approach, drawing upon prior Research and Development (R&D) employing the Educational Design Research (EDR) model. Empirical data are examined through a philosophical reflection using Erich Fromm’s concepts of being, having, and automaton conformity. The reflection reveals that AI is not inherently dehumanizing when positioned as a reflective and dialogical medium rather than as a substitute for educators. Instead, AI can enhance the process of value formation, self-awareness, and moral responsibility when integrated within a humanistic pedagogical framework. The article further emphasizes that educators remain central as pedagogical subjects and guardians of value orientation, while AI functions as a pedagogical partner that supports reflective learning. Theoretically, this study contributes to the field of philosophy of education by proposing a reflective humanistic framework as an ethical foundation for the use of AI in value and character education in the digital era.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025)

Section

ARTICLES
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Gunawan, Indra, Fuad Nawawi, and Fauzan Akbar Novianto, trans. 2026. “Refleksi Humanisme Dalam Perspektif Erich Fromm Berbasis Penelitian Pengembangan Modul Ajar Pendidikan Nilai Dan Karakter Berbantuan Artificial Intelligence”. JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama Dan Kemanusiaan 11 (2): 344-58. https://doi.org/10.24235/mbybe260.

References

Bey, Valentinus. “Fenomena Artificial Intelligence Dan Bahaya Dehumanisasi (Analisis Kritis Terhadap Fenomena AI Berdasarkan Pandangan Herbert Marcuse).” AKADEMIKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 23, no. 1 (2024): 54–63. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31385/jakad.v23i1.11.

Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk, and Louisa H.Y. Tsi. “Will Generative AI Replace Teachers in Higher Education? A Study of Teacher and Student Perceptions.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 83 (2023). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. On the Internet. Routledge, 2008.

Fan, Yizhou, Luzhen Tang, Huixiao Le, Kejie Shen, Shufang Tan, Yueying Zhao, Yuan Shen, Xinyu Li, and Dragan Gašević. “Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Technology 56, no. 2 (2024): 489–530. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544.

Freire, Paulo. “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.” In Toward a Sociology of Education, 374–86. Routledge, 2020.

Fromm, Erich. “Escape from Freedom. Farrar and Rinehart.” Inc., New York, 1941, 1–3.

———. “Mendidik Si Automaton.” In Menggugat Pendidikan, edited by Omi Intan Naomi, VIII. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.

———. “The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil.” Inc., New York, 1941, 1–3.

———. To Have or to Be? A&C Black, 2013.

Han, Byung-Chul. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. Verso Books, 2017.

Holmes, Wayne, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Ken Holstein, Emma Sutherland, Toby Baker, Simon Buckingham Shum, Olga C. Santos, et al. “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework.” Int J Artif Intell Educ 32 (2021): 504–26. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.

Luckin, Rosemary. Machine Learning and Human Intelligence. The Future of Education for the 21st Century. UCL institute of education press, 2018.

McKenney, Susan, and Thomas Reeves. Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge, 2018.

Miller, Andrew. “Social Justice and Education in the 21st Century,” 2008.

Nadya, Revalya, Ika Amalia, and Ichsan Fauzi Rachman. “Analisis Potensi Dan Tantangan Dalam Penggunaan AI Di Bidang Pendidikan.” Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya 3, no. 2 (2025): 295–309. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v3i2.1705.

Phenix, Philip H. “Esthetic Meaning.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 1, no. 1 (1966): 101–4.

Rombout, F., J.A. Schuitema, and M.L.L. Volman. “Teaching Strategies for Value-Loaded Critical Thinking in Philosophy Classroom Dialogues.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 43, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100991).

Rudolph, Jurgen, Samson Tan, and Shannon Tan. “ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 6, no. 1 (2023): 342–63.

Selwyn, Neil. Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

Tasioulas, John. “Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Ethics.” Daedalus 151, no. 2 (2022): 232–43. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01912.

Zuboff, Shoshana. “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Edn.” PublicAffairs, New York, 2019.