Rethinking Differentiated Mathematics Instruction: Teachers’ Readiness and Instructional Challenges in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v13i1.24096Keywords:
Differentiated instruction, Elementary mathematics , Teacher readinessAbstract
Background: Differentiated instruction has become increasingly important in addressing students’ diverse learning needs, particularly in elementary mathematics classrooms characterized by varying levels of numeracy readiness and learning abilities. Previous studies have rarely examined teachers’ pedagogical readiness and implementation challenges simultaneously, although both may shape whether conceptual understanding translates into adaptive classroom practice.
Aims: This study aims to analyze teachers’ readiness and instructional challenges in differentiated mathematics instruction within elementary school contexts, as well as the relationship between them.
Methods: This study employed a mixed methods approach involving elementary school teachers in Bali Province, Indonesia. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation analysis, while qualitative data from open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: The findings indicated that teachers’ readiness was generally at a moderate level. Conceptual readiness obtained the highest mean score, whereas assessment readiness showed the lowest level among the readiness dimensions. Classroom heterogeneity challenges emerged as the most dominant instructional challenge. The study also revealed a significant negative relationship between teachers’ readiness and instructional challenges. Thematic findings further showed that teachers experienced difficulties in managing diverse mathematical abilities, conducting differentiated assessment, and implementing adaptive instruction within limited instructional time.
Conclusions: Differentiated mathematics instruction requires not only conceptual understanding but also stronger pedagogical readiness and institutional support to foster more adaptive mathematics learning practices in elementary schools. Examining readiness and challenges together clarifies the factors shaping its implementation in elementary schools.
References
Aba-Wajji, N. A.-M., Weldmeskel, F. M., & Ayane, Z. N. (2026). Perception toward formative assessment literacy and practice among secondary school mathematics teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 20(1), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v20i1.23447
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Bal, A. P. (2023). Assessing the impact of differentiated instruction on mathematics achievement and attitudes of secondary school learners. South African Journal of Education, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2065
Bi, M., Liu, X., Cai, J., Cheng, Z., & Zhu, C. (2026). From teachers’ self-efficacy belief to their differentiated practice: the mediating roles of collaboration and attitude. Social Psychology of Education, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-026-10186-1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Conway-Turner, J., Williams, J., & Winsler, A. (2023). Does Diversity Matter? School Racial Composition and Academic Achievement of Students in a Diverse Sample. Urban Education, 58(6), 1085–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920902257
Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178466
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage publications.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: A configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Estaiteyeh, M., & DeCoito, I. (2024). The Long-Term Impact of Training on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Practices: Teacher Candidates’ Knowledge Retention and Future Aspirations. International Journal of Diversity in Education, 24(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0020/CGP/v24i01/65-88
Frerejean, J., van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Visscher, A. J. (2021). Ten steps to 4C/ID: training differentiation skills in a professional development program for teachers. Instructional Science, 49(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09540-x
Gabaldón-Estevan, D. (2020). Heterogeneity versus homogeneity in schools: A review of the educational value of classroom interaction. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110335
Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D., & Lambert, R. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in primary grade mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.220
Gibbs, K., & Webster, G. (2026). Differentiated instruction in context: Insights from school leaders and teachers in a rural Australian Catholic primary school. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70098
Graham, L. J., de Bruin, K., Lassig, C., & Spandagou, I. (2021). A scoping review of 20 years of research on differentiation: investigating conceptualisation, characteristics, and methods used. Review of Education, 9(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3238
Hayden, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Cody, R. A., & Boldt, G. T. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions of Differentiation Following a Math Curriculum Implementation Study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532231215092
Hu, L. (2024). Utilization of differentiated instruction in K-12 classrooms: a systematic literature review (2000–2022). Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09931-y
Johnston, P., Dozier, C., & Smit, J. (2016). How Language Supports Adaptive Teaching Through a Responsive Learning Culture. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1173992
Kahmann, R., Droop, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2022). Meta-analysis of professional development programs in differentiated instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102072
Kalinowski, E., Westphal, A., Jurczok, A., & Vock, M. (2024). The essential role of teacher self-efficacy and enthusiasm for differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104663
Keuning, T., van Geel, M., Visscher, A., & Fox, J.-P. (2019). Assessing and Validating Effects of a Data-Based Decision-Making Intervention on Student Growth for Mathematics and Spelling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56(4), 757–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12236
Martin, C. S., Polly, D., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., & Pugalee, D. K. (2016). Perspectives and practices of elementary teachers using an internet-based formative assessment tool: The case of Assessing Mathematics Concepts. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v23.1.01
Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2020). Using Differentiated Classroom Assessment to Enhance Student Learning. Routledge.
Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on the use of differentiated instruction in inclusive classrooms: Implication for teacher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p136
Otwate, P., Kitsao-Wekulo, P., Nampijja, M., Langat, N., Oloo, L., & Onyango, S. (2025). Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of learning through play for preschoolers in Kenya. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-025-00151-4
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
Polly, D., Martin, C., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K., & Middleton, C. W. (2018). The influence of professional development on primary teachers’ TPACK and use of formative assessment. In Teacher Training and Professional Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vol. 4, pp. 1737–1760). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5631-2.ch081
Pozas, M., & Letzel, V. (2020). ‘I think they need to rethink their concept!’: examining teachers’ sense of preparedness to deal with student heterogeneity. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1689717
Prast, E. J., & Hickendorff, M. (2023). How do Dutch teachers implement differentiation in primary mathematics education? In Effective Teaching Around the World: Theoretical, Empirical, Methodological and Practical Insights (pp. 757–774). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_35
Prast, E. J., Stroet, K., Koornneef, A., & Wilderjans, T. F. (2023). What do students think about differentiation and within-class achievement grouping? Frontline Learning Research, 11(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v11i1.1079
Rijal, A., & Waluyo, B. (2025). Effectiveness of differentiated learning in mathematics: insights from elementary school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21806
Röhl, S., Davison, K., & Bardach, L. (2025). Heterogeneity in students’ perceptions of teaching quality: A marker of adaptive teaching? Learning and Instruction, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102245
Simon, P. D., & Zeng, L. M. (2024). Behind the Scenes of Adaptive Learning: A Scoping Review of Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Adaptive Learning Technologies. Education Sciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121413
Taylor-Cox, J., & Oberdorf, C. (2014). Using Formative Assessment to Drive Mathematics Instruction in Grades 3-5. Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. ASCD.
Trisnani, N., Retnawati, H., & Wuryandani, W. (2025). Diverse students in mathematics classrooms: Capturing differentiated instruction by Indonesian elementary teachers. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.20
Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.005
Valiandes, S., & Neophytou, L. (2018). Teachers’ professional development for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: investigating the impact of a development program on teachers’ professional learning and on students’ achievement. Teacher Development, 22(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196
Yin, Y., Olson, J., Olson, M., Solvin, H., & Brandon, P. R. (2015). Comparing two versions of professional development for teachers using formative assessment in networked mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(1), 41–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.967560
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Komang Sujendra Diputra, I Putu Julianto, Ni Ketut Desia Tristiantari, Gusti Ayu Putu Sukma Trisna, Khabibur Rohman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication and distribution. All articles published in the Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)
This license permits others to use, share, adapt, distribute, and reproduce the published work in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. Any derivative works must be distributed under the same license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Authors are allowed to deposit the final published version of their articles in institutional or other repositories and to share their work for academic and non-commercial purposes, provided that proper citation of the original publication in the journal is included.
The Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
