Analysis of Students’ Digital Accessibility in Terms of Use of Technology and Obstacles Faced in Learning Biology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v11i1.10241Keywords:
Biology, Digital accessibility, Consumption factors, Technology, Survey methodAbstract
The need for labor in the future has more complex criteria than what is needed today. The increasing complexity of these criteria is due to technological advances which are increasingly shifting the position of humans at work. Technology has advantages and stability and can predict the results obtained. So it is essential for everyone to prepare for the increasingly fierce competition in the world of work. One of the efforts made is to familiarize students with technology at school. However, this needs to be supported by the availability of facilities and infrastructure as well as the ability of students to adapt. So this study aims to capture the digital accessibility of students in terms of the factors and obstacles they face in using technology. These data were obtained by applying the survey method to 41 students at SMA Bandung City. In this study, the data were analyzed quantitatively and represented in the form of diagrams. The results of data analysis show that students have adequate digital accessibility. This is indicated by their readiness and independence in learning technology as an additional learning resource. However, the biggest obstacle students face is the lack of stability in the internet network. So that it interferes with the learning process.References
Abroto, Prastowo, A., & Anantama, R. (2021). Analisis hambatan proses pembelajaran daring dengan menggunakan aplikasi whatsapp di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1632–1638.
Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers and Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
Ariani, S. (2021). Problems of online learning during Covid-19. Jo-ELT, 8(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v8i1.3783
Aristiani, R. (2016). Meningkatkan percaya Diri peserta didik melalui layanan informasi berbantuan audiovisual. Jurnal Konseling GUSJIGANG, 2(2), 182–189.
Barosz, P., Gołda, G., & Kampa, A. (2020). Efficiency Analysis of manufacturing line with industrial robots and human operators. Applied Sciences, 10(April).
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. Internet and Higher Education, 38(April), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004
Cakir, O. (2012). Students ’ self confidence and attitude regarding computer : an international analysis based on computer availability and gender factor. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(1994), 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.772
Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2016). Where machines could replace humans-and where they can’t (yet). McKinsey Quarterly, 2016(3), 58–69.
Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for international teachers: examining tpack and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(24), 24–42.
Efriana, L. (2021). Problems of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in EFL Classroom and the Solution. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 38–47.
Eliana, Senam, Wilujeng, & Jumadi. (2016). The efffectiveness of project based e- learning to improve ICT literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5789
Erdermir, N., Bakirci, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Determining of student teachers ’ self-confidence using technology in instruction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 1–6.
Fraenkel. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Francom, G. M., & Moon, A. L. (2018). Enhancing educational technology confidence among teacher candidates: benefits of and lessons learned From a 1:1 Device University-Elementary School Pertnership. Journal of Information Technologu Education: Research, 17, 423–440.
Ginola, D. (2016). The implementation of flipped classroom by using ted-ed in writing iii class of third semester of english education study program of teacher training and education faculty Of Universitas Bandar Lampung. Linguistika : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 7(2), 35–43.
Greener, S., & Wakefield, C. (2015). Developing confidence in the use of digital tools in teaching. The Electric Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 260–267.
Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050
Hjorland, B. (2012). Method for evaluating Information Sources: An Annotated catalogue. Journal of Information Science, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512439178
Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2016). Testing a technology integration education model for millennial preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 196–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115615129
Kahar, S. R., Hanafi, H., & Alberth. (2016). The effect of edmodo on students’ willingness to communicate, intrinsic motivation and self-confidence of SMKN 4 Kendari. Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology, 1(2), 1–19.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge : a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Laksmiwati, P. A. (2018). Enhancing Indonesian students ’ self -confidence through the integration of problem-based learning (PBL) and technology. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 8(1), 13–27.
Lestari, D., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2019). A review on ICT literacy in science learning. IOP COnf Series Journal Of Physics, 1233. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012097
Lloyd, A. (2017). Information literacy and literacies of information : a mid-range theory and model. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 91–105.
Lubis, N., Lubis, A., & Purba, N. B. (2020). Project-based learning collaborated with digital media for indonesian efl learners’ self-confidence and communication skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Terpadu (JPPT), 02(01), 10–18.
Malureanu, A., Panisoara, G., & Lazar, L. (2021). The Relationship between self-confidence, self-efficacy, grit, usefulness, and ease of use of elearning platforms in corporate training during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6633).
Morrison, H. (1997). Information literacy skills: An Exploratory focus group study of student perceptions. Research Strategies, 15(1), 4–17.
Moto, S., Ratanaolarn, T., Tuntiwongwanich, S., & Pimdee, P. (2018). A Thai Junior High School Students ’ 21 st Century information literacy, media literacy, and ICT literacy skills factor analysis. IJET, 13(9), 87–106.
Muhtia, A., Suparno, & Sumadi. (2018). Blended learning using schoology as an online learning platform. In ELLiC Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 171–175).
Nelson, M. J., Voithofer, R., & Cheng, S.-L. (2018). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.023
OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030.
Özkiziltan, D., & Hassel, A. (2021). Humans versus machines: An overview of research on the effects of automation of work. SSRN Electronic Journal, (January 2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789992
Powell, A., Noble, C. H., Noble, S. M., & Han, S. (2019). Man vs machine : Relational and performance outcomes of technology utilization in small business CRM support capabilities. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 725–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2015-0750
Rigianti, H. A. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran daring guru sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Elementary School Onlie, 7(2), 297–302.
Saputra, Y., Suwiryo, A. I., & Artyana, E. R. (2018). Sign language interpreting in English language teaching for a deaf student: A case study. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(1), 1–16.
Siahaan, E. B. (2020). Students ’ Perception of Edmodo use as a learning tool. Journal of English Teaching, 6(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.1061
Singh, K. P., Kumar, M., & Khanchandani, V. (2015). Information Needs and information seeking behavior of foreign students in University of Delhi : A Survey. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 5(2), 25–43.
Sujadi, I., Kurniasih, R., & Subanti, S. (2017). The effectiveness of learning material with Edmodo to enhance the level of student ’ s probabilistic thinking. AIP Conference Proceedings, 040005(May). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983943
Sulaiman, K. A. (2020). Socio-psychological factors as determinants to information-seeking behavior of LIS Undergraduates in Kwara State. INSANIYAT Journal of Islam and Humanities, 5(1), 49–62.
Surahman, E., Santaria, R., & Setiawan, E. I. (2020). Tantangan pembelajaran daring di Indonesia. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 89–98.
Taherdoost, H. (2019) What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale / attitude scale / likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 8. ffhal-02557308
Titi, L., & Sumarni, W. (2020). Kendala pembelajaran daring selama pandemic Covid-19. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2020.
Wishnoebroto, W. (2010). Human Vs. machine: Why young learners need new ways for learning. Humaniora, 1(2), 586. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v1i2.2899
Yamin, F. M., Ramayah, T., & Ishak, W. H. wan. (2013). Information searching: The Impact of user knowledge on user search behavior. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649213500238
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LETTER OF COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT
I am the author of an article on Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains in collaboration with the Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII), the undersigned:
State that:
- My paper is the work itself, authentic, has never been published in journals and other publications;
- My paper is a work on original ideas / research, not the result of plagiarism;
- My paper was not published from the help of others, except on the recommendation of the editorial and reviewer board that was selected by this journal;
- My paper, there are no writings or opinions that I have written other than including the reference source in the bibliography;
- I give all my copyright of this paper to this journal include the right for managing and publication;
- I make this assignment surely. If there are distortion and untruth in this assignment, later, I will take responsibility as the current law.