PEDAGOGICAL ACTION AND TECHNOLOGIES DURING ONLINE LEARNING: A CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v4i1.11318Keywords:
technology, pedagogy, language teachingAbstract
Technology implementation has become a norm in today's teaching and Learning, including in EFL instruction at university level. However the investigation within pedagogy and technology fusion are rare to discuss. Therefore, this research investigates a lecturer's actions and technological performance in the learning process. This research uses descriptive qualitative, using case study principles. The data was taken from vocabulary class document, an interview three students of vocabulary for academic purposes class, and online class observation field notes. they aimed to determine the performance of pedagogy and technology in online Learning. The goal is to explain the pedagogical aspects of technology implementation seen from Laurillard’ persepectives (2012). It was found that pedagogical actions practiced are as follows; Narrative, interactive, adaptive, Productive, and Communicative pedagogical actions.References
Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.
Ahmad, S. (2012). Pedagogical action research projects to improve the teaching skills of Egyptian EFL student teachers. Proceedings of the ICERI2012, Spain.
Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google classroom: Teachers’ perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52.
Barry. (1998). A Study of Students Perception in English Classes.Vol.33 No.2.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of teaching and learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198-206.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold; research and policy in educational technology-a response to fool’s gold. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 7-69.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Merrill
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approches (3rd). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dabbagh, N. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concept, strategies, and application. Pearson education, Inc.
European Commission (2001).The e-Learning Action Plan: Designing tomorrow’s education.http://www.elearningeuropa.info.
Gençlter, B. (2015). How does technology affect language learning process at an early age? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(2015), 311 – 316. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283165281_How_does_Technology_Affect_Language_Learning_Process_at_an_Early_Age
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson.
Hinkelman, D. (2018). Blending technologies in second language classrooms. Springer.
Iftakhar. I. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, (2).
Leaver, B. L., & Willis, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and programs. Georgetown University Press.
Leh, A. S. (2005). Learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1),25-41.
Norton, L. (2014). The case for pedagogical action research in psychology learning and teaching. Psychology Teaching Review, 20 (2).
Okojie, M. C., Olinzock, A. A., & Okojie-Boulder, T. C. (2006). The pedagogy of technology integration. Journal of technology studies, 32(2), 66-71.
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behaviour (10th ed.). Prentice Hall
.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: 1. copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher; 2. publishers of JETs: Journal of English Teachers are English Language Teaching Department, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon and MGMP Bahasa Inggris SMA Kab. Cirebon; 3. the copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY 4.0); and 4. every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "copyright transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication