Berpikir Kritis dalam Wacana Akademik: Analisis Wacana Kritis terhadap Artikel di Jurnal Terindeks Scopus

Authors
  • Dewi Herlina Sugiarti

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
  • Syihabuddin Syihabuddin

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
  • Andoyo Sastromiharjo

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
  • Khaerudin Kurniawan

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
Keywords:
analisis wacana kritis, artikel jurnal, berpikir kritis, PRISMA, wacana akademik
Abstract

Berpikir kritis merupakan kompetensi kunci dalam praktik akademik, namun kajian sebelumnya cenderung memaknainya sebagai kemampuan kognitif individual dan jarang menempatkan teks artikel jurnal sebagai objek analisis. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis representasi indikator berpikir kritis dalam teks artikel jurnal terindeks Scopus melalui pendekatan Analisis Wacana Kritis. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain analisis teks multiartikel. Data penelitian berupa sepuluh artikel jurnal terindeks Scopus yang dipilih secara sistematis melalui tahapan Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Analisis data dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan indikator berpikir kritis Facione, meliputi interpretasi, analisis, evaluasi, inferensi, eksplanasi, dan regulasi diri, sebagai lensa analitik untuk mengidentifikasi pola diskursif dalam teks. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa indikator interpretasi dan analisis muncul secara konsisten dalam seluruh artikel yang dianalisis, sementara indikator evaluasi, inferensi, eksplanasi, dan regulasi diri menunjukkan variasi intensitas kemunculan antarteks. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa berpikir kritis direpresentasikan sebagai praktik diskursif yang terintegrasi dalam cara penulis membangun argumen, menafsirkan data, dan mengelola klaim pengetahuan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa berpikir kritis dalam teks artikel jurnal berfungsi sebagai praktik diskursif yang berperan dalam konstruksi dan legitimasi pengetahuan ilmiah.

Critical Thinking as a Discursive Practice in Journal Articles: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Critical Thinking Indicators

Critical thinking is a core competence in academic practice; however, previous studies have largely conceptualized it as an individual cognitive ability and have rarely examined academic journal articles as objects of analysis. This study aims to examine how critical thinking indicators are discursively represented in Scopus-indexed journal articles using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach. Employing a qualitative multi-article text analysis design, the study analyzes ten Scopus-indexed journal articles selected through a systematic procedure guided by the PRISMA framework. Data were analyzed using Facione’s critical thinking indicators, interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation, as analytical lenses to identify recurring discursive patterns across texts. The findings indicate that interpretation and analysis consistently appear in all analyzed articles, whereas evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation show varying degrees of representation. These results suggest that critical thinking is discursively enacted through argumentative construction, data interpretation, and the management of knowledge claims. The study concludes that critical thinking in journal articles functions as a discursive practice that contributes to the construction and legitimation of academic knowledge.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

Al Chazim, A. K., Mulyaningsih, I., & Uswati, T. S. (2019). Analisis Wacana Kritis Berita Politik Fajar Cirebon Edisi November 2018¬Januari 2019 (Critical Discourse Analysis of Political News of Fajar Cirebon Edition November 2018¬January 2019). Jalabahasa, 15(2), 130–146. DOI: 10.36567/Jalabahasa.V15i2.340

Andriyani, N., Santoso, A., & Susanto, G. (2024). Diskriminasi Terhadap Ibu Bekerja Dalam Novel Sesuk Karya Tere Liye: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 9(2), 297–312. DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v9i2.13642.

Aprilia, L. E., & Al Anshory, A. M. (2024). A Critical Discourse Analysis on the Representation of Rape among Sudanese Women on Al-Jazeera.Net. SUAR BETANG, 19(1),59–68. DOI: 10.26499/surbet.v19i1.14743.

Basori, B., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Wiranto, W. (2023). Analysis of Vocational Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using the OER-Assisted Blended Learning. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(2), 264–270. DOI: 10.46843/jiecr.v4i2.566.

Darmawan, S. M., & Warmi, A. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Kelas 12 Pada Materi Statistika. Jurnal Educatio, 8(1), 280–289. DOI: 10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1980.

Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power. Routledge.

Faqih, M. I., Oliviasari, E., Lestari, S. A., Larassati, N., & Wardhani, I. S. (2024). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V SDN Socah 1 Bangkalan Dalam Muatan Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SENPIKA), 2, 373–383.

Goziyah, G., & Asifa, S. N. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis of Novel ‘Yusuf Dan Mentari’ by Irma Surya. Aksis : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 268–275. DOI: 10.21009/AKSIS.050202.

Harun, H., Alam, A. M., & Jufri, J. (2024). nalisis Wacana Kritis Pada Pidato Presiden Tahun 2022: Model Norman Fairclough. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 169–181. DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3163.

Hasnah, Y., Saragih, A., & Murni, S. M. (2025). Dissecting the Rise of Ideological Constructs in Educators’ Pedagogical Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(2), 557–565. DOI: 10.17507/tpls.1502.26.

Indiarti, C. L., Poerwanti, J. I. S., & Sularmi, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Materi Interaksi Sosial Pada Pembelajaran IPS Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 10(1), 31–36. DOI: 10.20961/ddi.v10i1.61573.

Jia, J. (2023). Russian-Chinese Idioms in Political Texts: A Corpus-Based Functional and Social Aspects Investigation. Philology. Theory & Practice, 16(9), 2767–2776. DOI: 10.30853/phil20230433.

Kamalia, N., & Wasis, W. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Fluida Statis. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 90–98. DOI: 10.26740/ipf.v10n1.p90-98.

Kamenova, K., & Haidar, H. (2022). The First Baby Born After Polygenic Embryo Screening. Voices in Bioethics, 8. Retrieved from DOI: 10.52214/vib.v8i.9467.

Karnedi, R. (2022). Diskursus Hadis Dalam Perspektif Kaum Tua dan Kaum Muda di Indonesia. Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 12(1), 134–156. DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2022.12.1.134-156.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice. Oxford University Press.

Listiara, A., Widodo, P. B., & Rusmawati, D. (2022). Pengaruh Pelatihan Keterampilan Membuat Inferensi Pada Pemahaman Teks Ekspositori. Jurnal EMPATI, 11(5), 344–350. DOI: 10.14710/empati.0.36743.

Mawaddah, S. M., & Roekhan, R. (2021). Pertarungan Ideologi Dalam Wacana ‘Merdeka Belajar.’ Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(1), 103–117. DOI: 10.31503/madah.v12i1.394.

Mudaningrat, A., Maryuningsih, Y., & Anugrah, I. R. (2022). Conformity Analysis of HOTS (Higher-Order Thinking Skills) Based on Critical Thinking in the Evaluation of High School Biology Learning in the East Cirebon Region. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 13(1), 37–47. DOI: 10.24042/biosfer.v13i1.11701.

Ningtyas, D. W., Agung, D. A. G., & Khakim, M. N. L. (2023). Analisis Wacana Nilai Pendidikan Multikultural Dalam Buku Teks Sejarah Indonesia Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(12), 1189–1204. DOI: 10.17977/um063v2i12p1189-1204.

Nyrup, R. (2022). The Limits of Value Transparency in Machine Learning. Philosophy of Science, 89(5), 1054–164. DOI: 10.1017/psa.2022.61.

O’Sullivan, J., & Ruairc, G. M. (2025). The Promotion of Distributed Leadership in Education at National Level: Discursive Change to Maintain the Old Order – Lessons from Ireland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(4), 807–828. DOI: 10.1177/17411432231206617.

Pilkington, B., Caplan, A., & Parsi, K. (2025). In an Age of Anti-Intellectualism, What Is the Value of Expertise? Voices in Bioethics, 11. Retrieved from DOI: 10.52214/vib.v11i.13851.

Pitaloka, H. A. (2024). Strategi Tutur Pejabat Negara Dalam Wawancara Youtube Perspektif Analisis Wacana Kritis. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 20(1), 151–165. DOI: 10.25134/fon.v20i1.9349.

Purnomo, F., Khoiriyah, M., & Kholifah, S. N. (2023). Analisis Sistematis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Literatur Pendidikan Bisnis. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Rakyat. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:280429489.

Resnick, V., & Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2025). Teachers as Epistemic Agents: A Case Study of Interdisciplinary Pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 51(3), 1128–1148. DOI: 10.1002/berj.4113.

Rosyidah, N. D., Kusairi, S., & Taufiq, A. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Model STEM PjBL Disertai Penilaian Otentik Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(10), 1422–1427. DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v5i10.14107.

Saidah, A. T., & Muhid, A. (2025). Transformasi Evaluasi Pendidikan di Era Digital : Integrasi Asesmen Autentik dan Learning Analytics. Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:283063889.

Sarip, N., Kaharuddin, K., & Palloan, P. (2022). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X di SMAN 10 Makassar. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, 18(3), 291–300. DOI: 10.35580/jspf.v18i3.31668.

Setiaji, A. B., & Fajriani, F. (2022). Analisis Wacana Kritis: Pemberitaan Konflik Rohingya di Media Komunikasi. Lingue Jurnal Bahasa Budaya dan Sastra, 4(1), 51–66. DOI: 10.33477/lingue.v4i1.3258.

Sholakodin, A. F. (2021). Arus Utama Wacana Identitas Penghayat Kepercayaan Pasca Putusan MK di Media Daring Kompas.com. JSPH (Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis), 6(2), 166–182. DOI: 10.17977/um021v6i2p166-182.

Sidabutar, E., Situmorang, I., & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2025). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa: Tinjauan Sistematis. Invention: Journal Research and Education Studies, 6(3), 896–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51178/invention.v6i3.2913

Sintia, G., Ali, S. N. A., Lombu, S. H., & Joharis, M. (2025). Peran Literasi Kritis Dalam Meningkatkan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa. Journal of Law, Education and Business, 3(1), 464–469. DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v3i1.5828

Soedarsono, M., Hajar, I., Musriani, M., Kaharuddin, K., & Musawir, M. (2023). Benturan Ideologi TV One dan Kompas TV Dalam Konstruksi Pemberitaan Korupsi. Jurnal Onoma Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 1506–1512. DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2918.

Sukarismanti, S., Rustono, R., Mardikantoro, H. B., & Samsudin, S. (2024). Analisis Wacana Kritis Surat Edaran Gubernur NTB Tentang Pencegahan Covid-19: Aplikasi Model Fairclough. Jurnal Onoma Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 789–796. DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3110.

Syafitri, E., Saragih, S., Napitupulu, E. E., Rahmadani, E., & Astuti, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi SPLTV Melalui Model Pembelajaran Project Base Learning (PBL) Berbasis STEM. Jurnal Mathematic Paedagogic, 6(2), 131–142. DOI: 10.36294/jmp.v6i2.2440.

Syaputra, J., Damayanti, V. S., Anshori, D. S., & Sastromihardjo, A. (2023). Literasi Data: Dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah di Perguruan Tinggi. KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching, 9(1), 204–212. DOI: 10.22219/kembara.v9i1.23883.

Tarigan, A. J., Surif, M., Lubis, M., Ritonga, M. U., & Hadi, W. (2023). Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Teun A. van Dijk Pada Teks Berita di Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VII Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka Terbitan Kemendikbudristek Tahun 2021. Basastra, 12(1), 17–34. DOI: 10.24114/bss.v12i1.40645.

Ummah, W. C. C., & Khotimah, R. P. (2022). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial Berbasis HOTS di Kelas VII MTs. Khozinatul ’Ulum. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 33(2), 155–164. DOI: 10.23917/varidika.v33i2.16445.

Winter, P. D., & Carusi, A. (2023). Troubling Transparency: Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Clinical Applications. Medical Humanities, 49(1), 17–26. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012318.

Yani, Y., Fajra, T. N., & Yulisma, L. (2023). Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Berpikir Kreatif. Bioed : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 39–46. DOI: 10.25157/jpb.v11i1.10161.

Zaroh, I., Muntholib, M., & Joharmawan, R. (2022). Implementasi Instrumen Asesmen Argumentasi Ilmiah Materi Laju Reaksi. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 78–90. DOI: 10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12191.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-04-19
Data Availability Statement

The data that support this study are not publicly available due to [reasons e.g., privacy/ethical restrictions]. Data may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in Indonesian Language Education and Literature agrees to the following terms:
  • The journal retains the copyright of the work and publishes it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits others to share, adapt, and use the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work.