Understanding Indonesian Affixes Among Arabic-Speaking BIPA Learners: Semantic Errors and Pedagogical Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/y4ghv768Keywords:
BIPA learning, first-language transfer, Indonesian affixation, morphology, semantic errorsAbstract
It is important to discuss affixes in BIPA learning, since affixes can be used to build grammatical and lexical meaning in sentences. But little research has been done on the understanding of affixes in the Arabic language by university students who are not native speakers of Arabic in Indonesia, especially in terms of their phonological and pragmatic understanding. The purpose of this study is to investigate (1) the understanding of Indonesian affixes by beginner-level students of the Arabic language and (2) the pattern of semantic errors in affix usage by the students. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory sequential design. The method used to collect quantitative data was questionnaires and an affixation test applied to 82 students of the Indonesian Language and Literature Program of Al-Azhar University, Egypt. In order to get further details regarding the findings of the quantitative data, 20 selected students were asked to give written interviews. The findings showed that students' level of understanding of affixes was different. The affix ke-an had the lowest error rate (80.5%), while the prefix ber- had the lowest accuracy (82.9%). The results also show that the form-oriented learning strategies, the interference of L1 transfer from Arabic, and the difficulty of understanding the semantic functions of affixes in sentences had the greatest effect on the occurrence of semantic errors. The results indicate that the learning of affixes among beginner BIPA learners needs context-rich teaching approaches that involve both form and meaning with the right scaffolding technique. In addition, the study will add to the understanding of second language (L2) morphological acquisition, especially in the language learning of Arabic speakers by learning the Indonesian language.
Memahami Imbuhan Bahasa Indonesia di Kalangan Pembelajar BIPA Berbahasa Arab: Kesalahan Semantik dan Implikasi Pedagogis
Penguasaan afiks merupakan aspek penting dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA) karena berperan dalam pembentukan makna leksikal dan gramatikal dalam kalimat. Namun, kajian empiris mengenai pemahaman afiks bahasa Indonesia pada pembelajar penutur bahasa Arab, khususnya dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi di luar Indonesia, masih relatif terbatas dan lebih banyak berfokus pada aspek fonologis dan pragmatik. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan tingkat pemahaman afiks bahasa Indonesia serta mengidentifikasi pola kesalahan semantis yang muncul pada mahasiswa penutur bahasa Arab tingkat awal. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods dengan desain explanatory sequential. Data kuantitatif diperoleh melalui angket dan tes afiksasi terhadap 82 mahasiswa Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di Universitas Al-Azhar, Mesir, sedangkan data kualitatif dikumpulkan melalui wawancara tertulis terhadap 20 partisipan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat ketepatan penggunaan afiks bervariasi, dengan konfiks ke-an memiliki tingkat ketepatan tertinggi (82,9%), sementara prefiks ber- menunjukkan tingkat kesalahan tertinggi (80,5%). Temuan kualitatif menunjukkan bahwa kesalahan terutama dipengaruhi oleh kecenderungan strategi belajar berbasis bentuk, keterbatasan pemetaan fungsi semantik afiks dalam konteks kalimat, serta pengaruh transfer bahasa pertama. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pembelajaran afiks bagi pembelajar BIPA pemula perlu dirancang secara kontekstual dengan mengintegrasikan aspek bentuk dan makna serta didukung oleh strategi scaffolding yang memadai.
Downloads
References
Abdulkaream, K. (2020). Challenges faced by Libyan students in learning Indonesian (strategies and factors). National Education Seminar, 211–215. Retrieved from https://www.jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/semnas2020/article/view/7522
Amenta, S., Foppolo, F., & Badan, L. (2025). The role of morphological information in processing pseudo-words in Italian L2 learners: It is a matter of experience. Journal of Cognition, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.420
Asteria, P. V., Suhartono, S., Inayatillah, F., & Sohnui, S. (2024). Improving the communication skills of beginner BIPA learners through the use of graphic organizers. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 10(2), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v10i2.33524
Ayoun, D. (2020). A longitudinal study in the L2 acquisition of the French TAM system. Languages, 5(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5040042
Azaz, M. (2019). L1 transfer effects in the production of generic plurals in L2 Arabic. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12542
Bañón, J. A., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2017). Morphological variability in second language learners: An examination of electrophysiological and production data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1509–1536. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000394
Besse, A.-S., Marec-Breton, N., Moreira, C. R. L., & Gombert, J.-E. (2019). Transfer of morphological awareness between Arabic as a first language and French as a second language during the first three years of learning. Psychologie Française, 64(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2018.05.001
Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning, 60(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. P. B. Allen & S. P. Corder (Eds.), Techniques in applied linguistics (pp. xx–xx). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Deng, T., Shi, J., Bi, H., Dunlap, S., & Chen, B. (2017). The relationship between morphological knowledge and L2 online processing of derivational words. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916629222
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(S1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x
Fahri, A. J., & Supriadi, R. (2023). Implications of the CEFR in the Sahabatku Indonesia textbook for Level 1 Arabic speakers. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 14(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v14i1.552
Haddad-Najjar, L., & Abu-Rabia, S. (2025). Exploring cross-linguistic transfer of phonology, morphology, syntax, and orthography from Arabic (L1) to English (FL): An intervention study. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(6), 1657–1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241300286
Hasanah, M., & Sari, R. R. (2021). Acquiring Indonesian pragmatic and cultural competencies among Indonesian language learners who are Arabic speakers at Al-Azhar University in Cairo. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS 2020) (Vol. 529, pp. 493–497). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210421.072
Hawkes, M. (2023). The impact of pre-task explicit instruction on task processes. TESOL Communications. https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20230203
Imad, M. (2024). Learning transfer and universal grammar: The case of Arabic as a foreign language. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-01
Ioannou, S., & Tsagari, D. (2022). Effects of recasts, metalinguistic feedback, and students' proficiency on the acquisition of the Greek perfective past tense. Languages, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010040
Kimppa, L., Shtyrov, Y., Hut, S. C. A., Hedlund, L., Leminen, M., & Leminen, A. (2019). Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex, 116, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.012
Laksanti, I. D. K. T. A. (2023). Verbs with the affixes me(N)- and ber- in Indonesian: Differences in syntactic behaviour and derivation. Language Description, 6(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.v6i2.9903
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
Luisa, A., Rangkuty, A. N. O., Sitompul, A. W., & Harahap, S. H. (2024). The application of collaborative learning model principles in BIPA instruction: A literature review. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i3.2233
Ma’rufah, L. A., & Arsanti, M. (2021). The presence of the Indonesian language at foreign universities. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 9(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.30659/jpbi.9.1.40-44
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Masrukhi, M. (2022). Errors in the writing of Indonesian sounds by Arabic native speaker students at Al-Azhar University, Cairo. Cakra Media Education Studies, 15(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.15.1.59428
Mikhaylova, A. (2018). Morphological bottleneck: The case of Russian heritage speakers. Journal of Language Contact, 11(2), 268–303. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01102005
Rafkahanun, R. (2021). Analysis of phonological errors in the speaking skills of BIPA learners at the Ismailia Centre for Indonesian Studies in Egypt. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v12i1.380
Roehr-Brackin, K., Baranowska, K., Pavlekovic, R., & Scheffler, P. (2024). The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 108(4), 815–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12963
Shehata, I. R. A. (2023). How to teach Indonesian grammar to Arabic-speaking learners of Indonesian as a foreign language? In The 12th Indonesian Language Congress (pp. 511–524).
Stoffelsma, L., Spooren, W., Mwinlaaru, I. N., & Antwi, V. (2020). The morphology–vocabulary–reading mechanism and its effect on students' academic achievement in an English L2 context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100887
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.
Suek, L. A. (2020). The establishment and development of Indonesian language classes for foreign speakers (BIPA) at the university level in the UK: Opportunities and challenges. Journal Lazuardi, 3(3), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.53441/jl.vol3.iss3.39
Tanwin, S. (2020). BIPA instruction in the effort to internationalise universities in Indonesia in the era of globalization. Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia Prima, 2(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.34012/bip.v2i2.1215
Wang, D., Wang, S., Zinszer, B., Sheng, L., & Jasińska, K. (2022). Cross-linguistic influences of L1 on L2 morphosyntactic processing: An fNIRS study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101063
Yoviyani, S. H., & Mulyati, Y. (2023). Unravelling the phonetic systems of Indonesian and Arabic and their implications for BIPA learning. Onoma Journal: Education, Language, and Literature, 9(2), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2838
Zhang, H. (2021). The longitudinal effect of morphological awareness on higher-order literacy skills among college L2 learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101969
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2024). Self-regulated second language learning: A review of types and benefits of strategies, modes of teacher support, and pedagogical implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 720–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055081
Zhang, Y., & Li, R. (2016). The role of morphological awareness in the incidental learning of Chinese characters among CSL learners. Language Awareness, 25(3), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1162167
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data were collected through questionnaires and diagnostic tests involving 82 students, as well as written interviews with 20 participants at Al-Azhar University, Egypt. To protect participants' privacy, the data are not publicly available. Anonymized data may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to ethical considerations and participant confidentiality.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Han han Ulumudin Ismail, Shirly Rizki Kusumaningrum, Radeni Sukma Indra Dewi, Abdul Aziz Khoiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The journal retains the copyright of the work and publishes it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits others to share, adapt, and use the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work.
