Evaluation of the CIPP Model for Integrated STEM Learning in STEM Institutions Based on the Mathematics Learning Processes and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v13i2.16711Keywords:
CIPP Model, Evaluation, STEM IntegratedAbstract
This research was carried out at a STEM institution with a focus on evaluating the implementation of STEM Integrated learning. The aim of this research is to evaluate using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model for STEM Integrated learning and assess students' learning achievements in the field of mathematics studies, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of the STEM Integrated learning process using the CIPP model in STEM institutions. The effectiveness of the learning process is assessed based on the level of achievement of learning objectives that have been set at the beginning of the learning period, namely in all aspects of STEM. This research adopts a qualitative approach using the CIPP model, which allows evaluation of aspects of context, input, process and product to achieve effective learning. Research participants involve students, STEM instructors. Primary data was collected through observation instruments, while secondary data was obtained from documentation and interviews. The results of the research show that the application of Integrated STEM learning in STEM-EC UPI can be categorized as good in the input component but can be categorized as quite good in the context, process and product components. This is due to the less than optimal mathematical aspects in the STEM Integrated approach in terms of instructor qualifications and aspect assessment results. mathematics students.
References
Aguayo, C., Videla, R., López-Cortés, F., Rossel, S., & Ibacache, C. (2023). Ethical enactivism for smart and inclusive STEAM learning design. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19205
Antony, M. K., Paidi, Subali, B., Pradana, S. P., Hapsari, N., & Astuti, F. E. C. (2019). Teacher’s TPACK Profile: The Affect of Teacher Qualification and Teaching Experience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012054
Casian, M., Mugo, L., & Marie Claire, M. (2021). Impact of Teacher’ Qualification on Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Rwanda. Journal of Education.
Cheng, H., Buntting, C., & Jones, A. (2022). Concepts and Practices of STEM Education in Asia.
Dahal, N. (2022). Transformative STEAM Education as a Praxis-Driven Orientation. 5, 167–180.
Degeng, I. N. S., Sutadji, E., Esa, Y., & Rinanityas, P. (2021). The Effect of PBL-based STEAM Approach on The Cognitive and Affective Learning Outcomesof Primary School. 12(6), 2390–2399.
Harden, R. M. (2000). The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation.
Lavery, S., Coffey, A., & Sandri, S. (2017). The value of service-learning in a pre-service secondary teacher qualification. In International Perspectives on Inclusive Education (Vol. 12, pp. 241–263). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000012015
Lee, S. W., & Lee, E. A. (2020). Teacher qualification matters: The association between cumulative teacher qualification and students’ educational attainment. International Journal of Educational Development, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102218
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given†in STEM education. In International Journal of STEM Education (Vol. 6, Issue 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
Liao, C. (2022). The STEAM learning performance and sustainable inquiry behavior of college students in China. October, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975515
Miqdadi, R., & Al-Jamal, D. (2013). Difficulties in Content and Language Integrated Learning: The Case of Math. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306314476
Puspitarini, D. (2022). Blended Learning sebagai Model Pembelajaran Abad 21. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i1.307
Ramadani, M., & Supahar. (2017). Instrument Evaluasi Model CIPP. Pascasarjana UNY.
Roberts, A., & Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum. http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/article.asp?issue=073&volume=&article=013
Rukayah, Daryanto, J., Ragil, I., Atmojo, W., Ardiansyah, R., Saputri, D. Y., & Salimi, M. (2022). Augmented Reality Media Development in STEAM Learning in Elementary Schools. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d’Information, 27(3), 463–471.
Sa’ida, N. (2021). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran STEAM pada Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 7(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v7n2.p123-128
Sebastian, A., & Periyathamby, E. (2020). An Impact on Teacher Qualifications on Student Achievement in Science: A Study on the G.C.E (O/L) in Trincomalee District. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 10(2). http://ijesc.org/
Stewart, A., Mueller, M., & Tippinss, D. (2021). Converting STEM intooSTEAM Programs Methods and Examples frommand forrEducation. http://www.springer.com/series/11800
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand.
Tsani, I., Arsyadana, A., Sufirmansyah, & Shafira, E. (2021). Evaluasi Model Cipp pada Pembelajaran PAI dan Budi Pekerti di SMA Negeri 7 Kota Kediri. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam , 12.
Vicente, F. R., & Llinares, A. Z. (2020). “ Sustainable City â€: A Steam Project Using Robotics to Bring the City of the Future to Primary Education Students. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229696
Zayyinah, Z., Erman, E., Supardi, Z. A. I., Hariyono, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). STEAM-Integrated Project Based Learning Models : Alternative to Improve 21st Century Skills. 627, 251–258.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, the author(s) agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention and Licensing The author(s) retain the copyright of their work and grant EduMa the right of first publication. The article is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the work for any purpose, provided that the original authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
Author Rights: Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their published article (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites). Authors retain the right to use their articles for any lawful purpose without requiring written permission from EduMa, provided that the original publication in this journal is clearly acknowledged.
Website Content License: All content published on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching by https://syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/eduma/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
