Muhassināt al-Ma’nawiyyah in Surah Al-Insān: Content Analysis and Social Solidarity

Authors

  • Muhammad Ivang Rizaldi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Ahmad Dardiri Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Raswan Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Achmad Fudhaili Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24235/876dv981

Keywords:

Muhassināt al-Ma’nawiyyah; Surah Al-Insān; social solidarity; rhetoric of the Qur'an

Abstract

Research on Qur'anic rhetoric has largely focused on structural aspects, while its role in fostering social solidarity in contemporary Muslim societies remains underexplored. This study identifies the types of muhassināt al-ma'nawiyyah in Surah Al-Insān verses 1-15, analyzes their rhetorical function, and examines their relevance for social solidarity. The method is qualitative content analysis of the verse text, supported by secondary data from balāghah literature, tafsir, and prior studies. Findings show that three devices, al-ṭibāq, murā'āt al-naẓīr, and al-tafrīq, work together to construct a discourse of solidarity. Sociologically, al-ṭibāq reinforces social boundaries by contrasting gratitude with ingratitude (kufr) and safety with duress; murā'āt al-naẓīr typifies vulnerable groups, namely the poor, orphans, and captives, and rejects symbolic transactions in charity; al-tafrīq plays the most important role by distinguishing al-abrār from al-kāfirīn, vulnerabilities that require different responses, and pressure from glory. Practically, verses containing al-tafrīq (QS. Al-Insān: 4-5, 8-9, 10-11, 13-15) are recommended as teaching material for religious educators, Islamic boarding schools, and mosque-based programs. Theoretically, this research offers a functional analysis of muhassināt al-ma'nawiyyah bridging balāghah and sociology.

References

Abdul-Raof, H. (2000). The Linguistic Architecture of the Qur’an. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 2(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2000.2.2.37

Aḥmad al-Hāshimī. (1943). Jawāhir al-Balāghah fī al-Ma‘ānī wa al-Bayān wa al-Badī‘. al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyyah.

Akthar, J. (2024). Social Justice and Equality in the Qur’ān: Implications for Global Peace. Edinost in dialog: Revija za ekumensko teologijo in medreligijski dialog, 79(1), 23–45.

Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=bZk6DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=The+Civil+Sphere.&ots=QsDlNlS91R&sig=jsOOOjiZ1CYCOTXfsOS1909orOo

al-Marāghī. (1946). Tafsīr al-Marāghī. Maṭba‘ah Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Aulādih.

al-Qurṭubī. (1964). Al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Alshboul, R., & Fawaris, H. (2021). Social Morals in the Quran and Sunna Texts: An overview. https://philpapers.org/rec/ALSSMI

Aras, Z. (2025). Essential Parameters for the Reconstruction of Society. Islamic Studies, 64(2), 181–202.

Asnawi, A. R., Aziz, H., & Haris, A. M. (2022). Investigating cohesiveness of qs. al-mā’idah: A review on michel cuypers implementation of semitic rhetorical analysis (SRA). Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 23(1), 49–68.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Dalam Social theory re-wired (hlm. 110–122). Anchor Books.

Bor, A., & Şahin, H. (2018). The nature of disposition (fiṭrah) in relation with religion. Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi, 22(3), 1765–1788.

Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural theory: An anthology, 1(81–93), 949.

Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict (Vol. 9). The Free Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=GvErbayPhcgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=The+Functions+of+Social+Conflict.+&ots=hZ8U2HW7ec&sig=dCO4uisYYoCtWwo7JOK6Grntbys

Demirel, D. (2024). Sociological and Political Origins in IBN Khaldun’s State Theory. Sociology Lens, 37(3), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12473

Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. Dalam Social theory re-wired (hlm. 52–67). The Free Press. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315775357-6&type=chapterpdf

Fàbregues, S., Younas, A., Escalante-Barrios, E. L., Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Vázquez-Miraz, P. (2024). Toward a Framework for Appraising the Quality of Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241257555

Gillan, C., Palmer, C., & Bolderston, A. (2014). -QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES AND ANALYSIS. Dalam Research for the Radiation Therapist (hlm. 156–181). Apple Academic Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/b16449-16/qualitative-methodologies-analysis-caitlin-gillan-cathryne-palmer-amanda-bolderston

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY, 259, 2002.

Halls, W. D., & Mauss, M. (2002). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203407448&type=googlepdf

Hamzah, A. H., & Jassem, M. H. (n.d.). Representation of Majesty of Godhead and Divinity Themes in the selected Quranic texts: A stylistic study.

Heer, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2012). Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis: A taxonomy of tools that support the fluent and flexible use of visualizations. Queue, 10(2), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133416.2146416

Hewage, U. H. W. A., Sinha, R., & Naeem, M. A. (2023). Privacy-preserving data (stream) mining techniques and their impact on data mining accuracy: A systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(9), 10427–10464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10425-3

Kasmo, M. A., Possumah, B. T., Mohamad, Z., Hassan, W. Z. W., & Yunos, N. (2015). The role of religion in social cohesion within the contemporary Muslim society in Malaysia: Revisited. Mediterranean Journal os Social Sciences, 6.

Knechtel, M. L., Torres, S., & Olaison, A. (2026). Exploring the Landscape of Research on Client Documentation in Social Work: A Scoping Review. Journal of Social Work, 14680173261435141. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173261435141

Kusherbayeva, A., & Kurmanaliyeva, A. (2025). Subject and Current Problems of Theolinguistic Research in World Religious Studies. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3).

Li, X., & Sunikka-Blank, M. (2021). Urban densification and social capital: Neighbourhood restructuring in Jinan, China. Buildings and Cities, 2(1), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.70

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=3CNrUbTu6CsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=qualitative+data+analysis+miles&ots=Lj81kjVM5e&sig=MlubC6QTZa7h0Yw5Dr7Co6FVHXI

Mutsagondo, S. (2026). A Conceptual Examination of Theorizing Syndromes in Doctoral Studies: A Case in the Information Sciences. Dalam Navigating Theory, Methodology, and Researcher Development in Doctoral Research (hlm. 199–224). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-conceptual-examination-of-theorizing-syndromes-in-doctoral-studies/384276

Poger, J. M., Schrodel, J. A., Moodie, P. C., Bordner, C., Sheriff, N., McCormick, J. B., & Kraschnewski, J. L. (2026). Bridging the gap: Community insights on effectively sharing research findings with the public. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 10(1), e69.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=rd2ibodep7UC&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=Bowling+Alone:+The+Collapse+and+Revival+of+American+Community&ots=G7Kgl2tnW-&sig=sTJxELpn84ZxuzkD_iwxJwGRSaQ

Serrano Lora, L. (2026). The Beautiful Prophet: A Literary and Thematic Analysis of Sūrat Yūsuf. Religions, 17(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020226

Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press.

Stewart, D. J. (2013). Divine Epithets and the Dibacchius: Clausulae and Qur’anic Rhythm. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 15(2), 22–64. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2013.0095

Tabassum, N. (2021). Rhetorical Devices in The Holy Qur’Én: Grammatical Shift and Communicated Subject Matters in Surah Al_Baqarah. Hamdard Islamicus, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v44i2.301

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Dalam R. Blaug & J. Schwarzmantel (Ed.), Democracy (hlm. 247–251). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-056

Downloads

Published

10-08-2026

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study consist of the Qur'anic text (Surah Al-Insān, verses 1–15), classical and contemporary works on balāghah and tafsīr, and published scholarly literature cited throughout the manuscript. All materials used in this study are publicly available through the references listed in the manuscript. No additional datasets were generated during the current study.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 189

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.